Welcome to the show we mean hotel light versus the Samsung Galaxy 851 camera comparison. These phones fall in the same price bracket, and it would be fascinating to see how these cameras stack up against each other before we start. This comparison makes sure to hit the subscribe button, press the bell icon and also hit the like button. If you find this video useful at some point in this comparison, we have the mean Odin light. First, with a 64 mega, pixels means Sony imx6 86 censored. It's called an 8 mega pixels ultra white 2, megapixels macro and 5 megapixels depth sensor on different the mean Odin light.
Has a single 16. Megapixels camera mean hotel light uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, G's image. Processing the 51, on the other hand, is a most popular Samsung, mid-range smartphone with a main 48 megapixels Sony mx-5 a two sensor. It's called a 12 megapixels ultra white 5, megapixels Metro and 5 megapixels depth camera. This one has a 32 megapixel, Sony imx6, one 6 front camerae, and it's using the exhaust 9 6 1 one's image processing.
Both camera apps come with a lot of features for the Minor 10 lights. Camera is slightly more feature-rich, with its integrated document scanner and more powerful Pro Mode, a 51 can do front camera slo-mo selfies, which is what the Nolan light cannot do. We noted light also has 1080p at 60 frames per second video recording, which is missing only 51. Other features of these phones are somewhat similar. Let's start this comparison by taking a look at the 64 mega, pixels high-res images in this mode, the HDR and the AI doesn't work on any of these phones.
Among the obvious differences is the extra amount of highlights on the 51. Its image is overexposed, while Amino taillights images well saturated and has a smoother look. The dynamic range and colors on the know. Tail light are quite under control as well. The same image in the normal or the low res mode brings highlights under control on the 51, but 50 ones.
Image remains considerably bright here to me, not a light image, for some reason happens to be very smooth. Some areas of the a-50 ones. Image are saying overexposed, but it's got a color boost. Fifty ones. Image also seems well sharp depth effect and the background blur is equally good on both handsets the main.
Difference is still in the color tone. Only fifty one's image is too much on the cooler side. We know taillights image once again remains slightly dull, with balanced colors as compared to super bright image of the eye, 51 the same image in the ultra-wide mode, and this needs no explanation in almost all the Men taillights videos. I have talked about the need for improvement in these phones. Ultra-wide result, a fifty one's image has a superb dynamic range.
The shadows appear darker in the image of the Minor taillight, take a look at some more high-res images and in their lorries and ultra white counterparts, the color of the sky on the. If every one is more bluish, and it's slightly gray on the Minor taillight details are good on both handsets fifty ones. Images appear cool once again in some scenes. There is a slight pinkish tone in the images of a 51 and the Men. Taillights images are very warm.
The difference between the high-res and low res images. Isn't that big, except for the color tone on the top, but in the ultra-wide mode the defense's become way too much obvious with the 51 clearly reading the mean Hotel line, because a 51 bring the extra highlights in the high-res images. I find its camera producing good images when there is no such object in an image that could destroy it. For example, this sunflower looks very good on the 51, but if you look at the background, which is being covered by the sunflower that is still being overexposed but as flowers cover it up, we know the lights. Image looks dull once again, but it's not over exposing any areas.
So in such cases it totally depends on the situation. Protection of both handsets is also good. The 51 in the normal mode is definitely producing sharper images. The sky, as you can see on the screen, clearly looks very good on the eye.51 and in the ultra-wide mode is 51. Strand.
Hammock range is clearly petal -. One thing that was common in the entire day.51 images was the extra light it tries to bring in the images in the standard mode. Auto HDR was turned on both handsets and I, find the dynamic range going very good on the high 51, the Minor taillight tries its best to balance all the aspects, and this may appeal some users, but the users who prefer brighter images they might like the output of the galaxy 51. Let me know about your choice. The macro camera is good on both handsets there is a difference of colors.
Just like the normal mode. The mean note that lights camera can shoot macro videos too. So this is definitely its advantage here. Samson needs to improve the night mode of its cameras. It's not the best in its class.
Yet we know the lights camera just like the normal images has a very balanced light in the night mode. Images as well in 51 can sometimes over expose the light source, while the mean hotel light takes good care of it. I will prefer the Men 10 lights, camera for the night mode any day over the Samsung Galaxy, a 51 and finally, the selfies. A 51 can capture enormous Lie big selfies, with better details in the 32 megapixels mode, but as far as a normal mode is concerned, its image is cool, neck and neck, with the mean hotel light. My face looks more natural in the images of the Minor delight it's a soft on both handsets, but the skin tone is definitely better than the Men tail light.
Saturation is too high on my face in the images of the 51 edge. Detection is very good on both handsets obviously in the portrait or the light focus mode. Both phones right, some edges, I personally, like the selfies coming out of the militant light, because it's not focusing on making any areas of my face. Read-Only it's time for the videos now, okay, the Nolan light in the 4k mode has some anonymous stability and this alone kills any other phone of this league. I am completely in love with this phone stability in the 4k, more than 51 doesn't have any stabilization.
The remaining result is on your screen in the 1080p at 30 frames per second normal mode. The EIS works on both phones. Both phones produce a good video here, but the result, but the result similar to the images can be seen here, -. As far as a kernel tone is concerned in the 1080p at 30 frames per second ultra-wide video. The resolution goes extremely poor, but the stability hits its peak.
Take a look at the front. Camera will use now guys. This is the front camera video comparison between the Men 10 light and the galaxy 51 right now. I am finding the saturation a bit high on the galaxy 51. The frame of the Men 10 light is slightly cropping and you guys tell me about the mics voice, recording quality and how these phones are capturing.
The colors. Let me show you around so drop your comments below and let me know which phone's, video and Mike's voice recording quality. Are you finding better, and this brings us to the conclusion me, not a light? Camera any day is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy a 51. Given that you have very good lighting condition for photography, a 51 may perform well in the low-light conditions, but it also has the ability to mess up the exposure while domino tail light maintains it will. You can bring the exposure of say if everyone down and increase the brightness of minor taillights images in post-processing, since we have to pick up a better all-rounder.
It is definitely the note in light because of its video stability. ? I do not mean to say that the 51's camera is poor. Yes, it is definitely very good, but just for 20 or 30 more dollars, you get a phone with a much better camera result so make sure that you choose your next one wisely. If camera is going to be your main concern, let me know about your thoughts in the comment section below subscribe. If you haven't yet, and do it tums up, if you like this video with that said, I will sign off and see you all in the next video.
Source : TechwithUsama