What is up folks, digit tech, and today I'm taking a look at the camera. Comparisons of homophone or Poco x3, NFC versus Samsung Galaxy note, 20, ultra alright, one difficult model. This is definitely not a fair compressor, because obviously one of the phone is a thousand two hundred us dollars. Another one is just like 200 us dollars, but anyway, I'm doing this test just to show you guys how much a thousand dollars different phone can make in terms of camera quality. So, let's get on with it. So for the first photos that I'm taking a look at is the foot and both of them have an AI mode and both of them detect this photo as a foot.
So, as you can see that note, 20 ultra has much warmer tone to it compared to polo, which is has much cooler form for this particular photos. I would say: Poco is a little more natural, because this is how the food looks like the egg definitely is like white compared to like yellowish or warmish colors on the note 20. , although both then have a lot of details on it and the sharpness is still there beside how I feel that Poco focus point catch a lot more area compared to note2 ultra, not 20, ultra looks a bit more like a micro shirt in these photos, instead of like an actual focus on the whole area. So for this particular image I would say, Poco x3 has a little better edge all right. Now, I'm taking a look at the figurine inside my car, which is Elvis himself alright.
So this is the normal mode, as you can see, that Poco is a little brighter than not 20 ultra here. But of course the background is totally blown out. You barely see the buildings behind it all the way into the distance, whereas not 20 ultra still keep a lot of details in its background. So here you can see that the HDR on note 20 ultra, is far better than a Poco x3, even though both of them still have quite sharp and detailed photos. Alright, so the next one is the portrait mode on Elvis again and as you can see, that vocal doesn't change the focal length and still keeps sand.
Although the both is still natural on Poco x3 and not 20, ultra cropping a little more into the focal length and the image is also sharp, and the pocket is really natural and there's no like weird cut or anything here, so both of them still produce quite a natural both and portrait mode works perfect. Here and moving on to this photo, you can see here the indoor and the outdoor lighting here you can see once again, Poco x3 in the background is really blown out like you cannot see anything now, you can barely see the building flying to the distance. Again, that's just how it is the HDR mod on Poco is not that great compared to note 20 ultra, even though you can see that within the building itself, both of them produce quite similar color tone and quite similar sharpness. Overall. So I wouldn't say it's much of a big deal with just a blown out background.
That's all and then move on to front facing camera for the first one is portrait normal mode, and you can see that Poco produce a little warmer tone compared to not only ultra here, as you can see, there's quite a lot of softness and building mode on polo, x3 and default mode in default mode compared to note 20 ultra. I feel that not 20 ultra produce much better to my true color tone to my skin, compared to poker x3 not to the ultra, have a lot of details and there's not a lot of softness and beauty more going on here. So definitely I would prefer not to ultra more compared to the software. That's happening all over Poco x3. Of course, you can tone down the building mode, but then, as a default.
This is what you get, and the next one is the portrait mode. You can see the portrayal doesn't change, much really detail here. Both of them produce quite similar results here and also the both once again is quite natural. There's no weird like lightning or off proportions. You can see all over so uh yeah above them.
The pocket is quite good, but of course not 20 ultra have better edge here, because the front facing camera or not 20 ultra does have a wide angle mode. As you can see, there's much more a shot of myself into the frame and is much better. If there's like a group of people here so and of course, the detail and the sharpness remain the same as is still using the same camera, it's just a different focal length. That's all, and of course you cannot get hit here with the Poco x3 right move on to low light normal mod, and here the sun is about to set and there's quite a good time for me to test quite a few uh mode of both of them for the first one, it's just a normal mode. You can see that both of them produce quite similar results here, but somehow I do feel that Poco x3 capture a little more like especially on the housing area.
On the right side. There's not much detail going on with the note 20 ultra on the house. You can see that it's quite dark compared to poker x3, but then, with the sharpness and the detailed itself, I would say not really ultra produce more true to live color compared to poker x3, which has much warmer tone again and then move on to the next shot, which is times two zoom. As you know, Poco x3 has digital zoom, whereas the Norton ultra has optical zoom um. Obviously, over here you can see the note ultra does much better job with the details and overall sharpness of the quality just because the optical zoom, compared to the digital zoom on Poco x3 focal s3.
You can see that there's quite a lot of noise going on, especially with the darker area and the blackness all over. You can see that there's quite a lot of noise all over there, but it's not too bad, though I would say uh note, 20 ultra still produce much cooler tone and sharpness all over and move on with the next one, which is wide angle, shot white Angus shirt does suffer a little on Poco x3. I think I feel that low light wide angle on Poco x3 just generally doesn't produce quite good results here, because you can see that the noise, the sharpness the detail, is much less than not 20 ultra so overall over here on wide angle, shots not 20 ultra does a much, much better job and the next one is the night shot. Uh. To be honest, I don't feel there's quite a lot of difference between both of the shots feel that they're just almost similar or if there's any difference at all.
I do feel that pocket x3 does have a little more detail, especially on the mods and cloud area, compared to note 20 ultra. Probably the scenery is still not that dark enough for note ultra to kick in is a night mod capability compared to poke s3 right. So now, with the raw format, the 64 megapixel versus 108 megapixels, note 20 ultra. So as you respect, both them produce a lot of details and sharpness all over the image. Of course, being 108 megapixel note, 20 ultra does seem to have a better edge over here, and especially you can tell that the hotel room light far into the distance.
The light is quite under control is not blown out on Notre Dame ultra compared to Poco x3, but overall there's not much other difference. I would say in this raw format, so yeah both of them does a perfect jobs on here. The next photo is also the same 64 megapixel versus 108 megapixels. Once again, you can see that note: 20 is brighter on overall match, but on Poco x3 the uh flow area is a little brighter. That's a little unusual, then the rest, the rest is a much brighter or not 20, ultra just a flow part and on the left part of the image Poco x3 does a little um brighter, but then of course, uh over all the details on note, 20 ultra is still much more details going on there, alright, so move on to the next shot with wide angle.
This time you can see again, white angle on Poco phone suffer quite a bit under low light. The whole image is much darker and less detailed compared to Notre Dame ultra, and even the cloud is a little blown out too on Poco x3. Here, it's pretty obvious that note, 20 ultra has the better edge on it's a wide angle, camera compared to poker x3. Well, it is what it is all right. So, for the last shot, I want to test the HDR off and on mode I want to see how much difference can bed on both the phones.
Interestingly Poco x3 does have a little of difference with this HDR off and on when it's on, I would say: uh it keeps the lights. The artificial lights are the lame light and the clouds more details. It's not that blown out which is with this HDR mod off, but then on a note, 20 ultra. I barely see any difference with this HDR off and on over. Here.
Probably the image doesn't make not too many ultra processing fields that it needs to make any difference. So I don't see any difference at all. Everything is just sharp and details all right. That's it there's some picture samples that I did with both this phone. If you want me to take small of this camera capability, you can comment down below give a like and a subscribed.
If you like, it does help my small little channel to grow and this shady tech. Until next video see you soon.
Source : Shady Tech