Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Galaxy A71 Camera Comparison By TechwithUsama

Strongest competitors right now, all dummy note in light and the galaxy SA only one these phones, co, neck and neck at many places, including the cameras in this video, we will take a look at how these cameras stack up against each other. Those of you who are new here, please subscribe press aware icon and do hit the thumbs up button. If you find this video useful starting off with the Men 10 light, we get this phone with full real cameras. The main camera here is the Sony imx6 86 64 megapixel sensor. This handset has an 8 megapixels ultra-wide 5, megapixels depth and 2 megapixels macro camera. It's using the image processing of snapdragon 730 G Minor delight own different.

Has a single 16, megapixels camera, the competitor galaxy, a 71 has a main Samsung GW 164 megapixels camera. It's also got a 12 megapixels ultra-wide 5 megapixels macro and 5 megapixels depth, camera galaxy. A 71 is using the image processing of snapdragon 7:30 or Snapdragon 730 DG as well. This phone on different has a whopping 32 megapixels camera. Both phones come with their typical camera.

Apps we get the 64 megapixels dedicated mode on both sides, its portrait mode versus a light focus mode. Both phones can do 4k at 30 frames per second videos, but the noted light can also do 1080p at 60 frames per second videos. Along with the macro videos, slow motion, night mode, super slo-mo, the pro modes are also available on both sides. The noted lights, camera app is slightly more powerful with some extended features. I have taken the images in a number of lighting conditions.

Similar modes were used on both the phones. Let's start off by taking a look at 64 mega pixels high-res images on both the sides right off the bat. We find a great color boost on the images taken by the Minor 10 light, the 70 one's image brings in too much of highlights. None of the phones maintain a realistic look, but the Men taillights image definitely has a lot of charm to it. Now the 64 megapixels images are definitely going to be very big, and these images we'll have much better details on both the sides.

The same image in the normal mode. On both phones maintains a similar look as far as the details go, the I-71 has caught them better here, Sony sensor, on the mean hotel light, is playing its role by boosting those colors edge. Protection of both the phones is somewhat equal going ahead. We find the note and light on a more natural side, while there is a slight pinkish shade. In the background of the galaxy s, everyone's image, the main hotel light in the high-res images, in my opinion, has a better dynamic range.

Although the ratio does not work on any of these phones in the 64 M people, the mean hotel light seems to be keeping a good balance between the lighter and the darker areas. On the I-71, we keep finding the increased situation, which is quite notable. The tree's trunk here looks over saturated. It has a slight pinkish shade, while it's fully brown on the Minor 10 light in the normal mode, I have found the galaxy a 71 offering a much better dynamic range, especially when we take a look at the sky. It looks amazing on the galaxy, a 71.

Let me show you some normal images, along with the ultra white counterparts in such images, the difference is too much clear. The I-70 one's ultra-wide camera offers better colors, dynamic range and slightly sharper images. Furthermore, all Troy camera of the 71 is wide ?, whereas the Men ten lights ultra wide-angle isn't too wide me. Northern Light can go up to 10x visual zoom, while they 71 stays at 8x only in the 64 megapixels mode. Once again, the 71 has the tendency to overdo the highlights.

As you can see, the noted light remains on a dull side, but maintains all the aspects of an image. The standard normal mode of the 71 is what produces very good images when I was shooting the images in a very good light. The colors of the Men 10 light looked very, very good, but as soon as I got in a little of shade, the 71 overtakes by brightening the images to an optimal level while the Men 10 light remains dull and increases the saturation. The skin tone also looks over saturated on the Men 10 right here. Background blur off both the phones is equally good, but again it's a matter of the lighting in the images.

Let me know which phone's lighting are you finding better ultra-wide camera again and I? Believe it's not nice time yet me has a lot to improve. I mean missile turret camera isn't bad, but Samsung's ultra-wide camera is way ahead. Some more images in the extraordinary lighting conditions and the image from the mean hotel light is looking extravagant. The only thing wrong with the images is that the flowers colors are popping way too much. Look how cool the background looks in the images of the Men 10 light, but the colors are kind of hitting my eyes.

I must say that a 71 has a better shadow management, as everything is actually quite visible in its image. Without any extra boost me no tail light is definitely adding more depth to the images here in the Into conditions of me, no 10 light goes on a cooler side, while a 71 goes on a warmer side. The colors of the Men 10 light in some situations come out better, but details are still being maintained better by the 71. A 71 has the ability to take some very impressive images in the indoor conditions too edge. Protection of the 71 in the indoor images also remains good macro camera of the galaxy assembly.

One is far superior to the Men 10 light. The color boost that we saw in the normal images of the Men 10 light that can be seen on its macro images as well so yeah. The colors may remain a subjective choice here. But if we talk about the details and overall clarity, the I-71 is doing a better job in the night mode. The Men 10 light isn't as good a 71 isn't very good either, but it's definitely ahead in this comparison, to say the least: Xiaomi has to improve the low light and night mode for photography of the Men 10 light it over saturates, the low light images.

Even here, the streetlights will look like going towards an orange or a reddish site. Both cameras produced a lot of noise, but 70 ones. Images looked better overall for the selfies, both handsets are doing a very good job. If we zoom in we find out that the 70 one's details are ahead once again, the skin tone on both handsets is entirely different. A 71 is more on the natural side.

Well, let me know: 10 light is kind of adding more saturation to the images portrait and the light focus modes, bring a very good background blur on both handsets for the videos Camino ten light they're significantly better I am not sure if this phone has OS, because Xiaomi hasn't mentioned it anywhere, but the stability of this particular footage in 4k resolution as compared to the galaxy. A seventy-one's 4k footage is way ahead. A 71 stability is kind of horrible in this mode in the 1080p mode. Both phones definitely has. The e is a 71, doesn't have the OS for any of its modes and, as I told you, I am not sure about the Minor 10 light.

The ultra white video also tells us about the wider camera angle of the galaxy, a 71. Now you will be able to watch the front. Camera will use hi guys. This is a front camera video comparison between the Xiaomi. We know 10 light and the galaxy a 71 now I am shooting outside in over 35 degrees, and that is why I am sweating a lot, but this video is good enough to give you an idea about the stability, the color configuration and the sharpness and other aspects of the front camera videos from both these handsets now.

Here the Galaxy a7 t1 can do Fertile from the front camera as well, which is what the note in light cannot do. It is capped at 1080p at 30 frames per second. Only. Let me show you around to give you a better idea of how these phones capture the colors and everything else in a video. Let me know which ones my quality are you finding better here and which phones overall result is looking better to you time for the conclusion, and my observations are as follows: throughout this entire comparison, I found the Men 10 light, adding extra colors to the images which look brilliant in great lighting conditions, but lose their depth under low light.

The I-71 brings extra highlights and overexposing images in extra bright light conditions, but performs very well when the light is nominal or low. If you are more of an outdoor photographer, the Men 10 light should be your choice without a doubt. But if you want an all-rounded is everyone, it is moving on to the performance of the front camera the eyes. Everyone produces better details. The macro and ultra-wide cameras of the I-71 are also way ahead in the video mode.

The Men 10 light stability is awesome. I wasn't really expecting this for me, but yeah. It has done a great job. So these are not the cameras where you can easily decide one being better than the other. It totally drills down to what you are looking for in the end.

So pick one of these as per your preference and as per your own requirements. If you have anything to say about this comparison, feel free to drop. Your comments in the comment section down below also make sure to drop your own opinion about these. If you haven't subscribed to my channel yet subscribe now do hit the like button as well. With that said, I will sign off, and I will see you all in the next video.

Source : TechwithUsama