What's up everyone welcome to another camera comparison video. Today I have this Xiaomi mi 11 and a VIVO x60 pro yeah. I have the smartphones, and this is true content. Please support true, honest content. If you end up liking this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and subscribe to this channel. Also, please don't forget to share this video on your social network like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and if you have any other camera comparison request like I have this VIVO x50 pro VIVO ICO, 7, Samsung, s20 Fe, and I'm holding for my VIVO x60 pro plus and Samsung s21 ultra.
So if you have any other camera comparison, video request, please don't forget to make a comment in the comment section below. Also, there is an international smartphone giveaway going on. Don't forget to check that. Well, let's start our camera comparison. Video! What's up, everyone welcome to another camera comparison! Video! Today I have the Xiaomi mi 11 and a VIVO x60 pro.
Okay, listen carefully, which microphone is working better check. My clothes, yeah color rendition is already better on VIVO x60 pro check carefully, in which video I look better yeah. It depends on you, which one you prefer. Please don't forget to make a comment, and let me know about this selfie camera video. Of course there is a smartphone giveaway going on.
This is an international smartphone giveaway, so it doesn't matter where are you from? You can just make a comment, a valid comment and subscribe to this channel yeah. In that way, you are joining this giveaway. Okay, before we flip to rear cameras, one request, if you end up liking this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and subscribe to this channel. Also, please share this video on your social network like Facebook, Instagram Twitter and help this channel to grow. These are daytime main sensor.
Photos. Please remember that VIVO x60 pro comes with Sony, mix, 598, 48 megapixel sensor, underneath that precious gist lens from merges AG and me 11 comes with Samsung ISO cell bright, AMX, 108 megapixel sensor, yes, in daytime under bright daylight. Both of these two performs great. If you don't compare these photos side by side, then you wouldn't notice that even if these photos looks great and similar, actually there are some differences. I am happy to see that Xiaomi mi 11 has really put up a fight, or, should I say, VIVO x60 profiled heard cause in some cases.
Xiaomi 11 performance is better than VIVO x60 pro, while x60 pro proven better in different conditions. I can say both offers images that is sharp full of details and dynamic range, but after snapping and checking almost 100 pictures side by side in the past 3 days, I found some key differences. VIVO x60 pro most of the time under bright lighting, condition, increases ambience and vibrancy. But interestingly exposure is almost perfect when a face is detected. Vito, x60 programs, more details and textures on the subject in the process.
Background loses sharpness and gets a bit soft. On the other hand, me 11 always have this increased, highlights and saturation issue, which is actually barely noticeable and pretty minimum. But as these are true flagships, I am trying to point out all the pros and cons both processed a lot of textures and both offers great details in the shadows. Yes, dynamic range and white balance jumps back and forth. There is no clear pattern of that, but most of the time it depends on ambient lighting condition.
However, color rendition is obviously better on Xiaomi 11, it's almost true to life. I also must mention that AI feature of me 11 is getting better with every update it gets. There are three factors you need to consider when you judge low light photos before I share those factors and points. Please note that this is a trend in any low light, condition where there are a lot of colors needed to be reproduced. None of these two smartphones performed like a true super flagship.
First, these photos are taken in a very harsh lighting condition. Number two color rendition is better on me11, while x60 pro produced perfect sharp images with enormous details and textures color rendition is better on me, 11, while x60 pro produced perfect, sharp images with enormous details and textures. Finally, me 11 kept the correct skin tone. Exposure is correct on both the subject and background, while VIVO x60 pro photos are slightly overexposed mid. Tones and shadows are a bit too higher than usual yeah white balance is pretty similar and once again there is a negligible difference, but VIVO x60 pro photos are slightly saturated.
The VIVO x60 pro got two telephoto lenses, one 13 megapixels 2x optical and another 8 megapixel periscope for 5x zoom. On the other hand, me 11 doesn't have any telephoto lens. It uses its 108 megapixel main sensor and applies digital cropping to deliver zoom images. These are 2x zoom images at a glance both look similar but for sure x60 pro picture is sharper and after cropping in, we can see the real difference. Of course, there are more textures and fewer grains in images produced by x60 pro now.
This is another picture. Yes, it's 200 percent cropped in of a 5x zoom photo Vito. X60 pro image is amazingly sharper. There is enough details along with superb texture processing. While me 11 failed.
This is why I prefer to use a smartphone with a periscope lens. I always say hardware is important, but a lot depends on software. Look at this, even if x60 pro has more details and sharpness due to poor stock camera application rendered colors and tonal contrast is truly awful. Okay, these are both or portrait photos, and I request that you watch through this part, because this is the most interesting part of this comparison. VIVO x60 pro comes with a 2x telephoto lens, and it is dedicated for true 50 millimeter portrait photos.
While me, 11 depends on the main sensor for portrait photos as there is no telephoto lens. When I compare portrait photos, I care about both effect, edge detection amount of textures processed in the subject and the separation line blend. I always mention in all of my camera comparison. Videos and yes, a lot depends on personal preference. This will be a preference thing for sure it depends on what you prefer like Samara.
The model in these pictures feels she looks better in the images grabbed by VIVO x60 pro. Actually, I think nobody would like to look pale. I have chosen this place and background with harsh lighting condition cause. This would make a clear difference. It is clear that there is a difference in white balance and tonal contrast.
VIVO x60 pro slightly saturates, the color and surprisingly, white balance is a bit warm. Usually Xiaomi is known for warm color temperature, but I have found me: 11 always produces images with a bit cool, color temperature. However, I have mentioned this earlier and once again, VIVO x60 pro color rendition is a bit far from reality because it rendered colors with different tonal contrast and color curve, which indeed made skin tone and background. Look better than me: 11. Edge, detection, edge, cutouts and separation line blend performance, randomly jumps back and forth, but VIVO x60 pro is a bit ahead.
Xiaomi's mi, 11, most of the time has clearly fallen behind. However, details and dynamic range is a bit better on me: 11. From low light to bright daylight and white balance on both of the smartphones, changed, Xiaomi increased highlights and white balance is back to its original warm temperature, while VIVO x60 pro increased vibrancy, but exposure and highlights are almost perfect in terms of details and sharpness. There isn't any big difference: color grading issue on VIVO x60 pro continues. I must mention that increased highlights and a bit lower contrast ratio didn't make the image any worse.
Rather, it turns the images lucrative and eye pleasing a lot depends on how you want it and what's your preferences are yeah, it's truly difficult to judge, but my vote goes to VIVO x60 pro. These video clips are recorded at 1080p, 30 frames per second, and, if you don't know yet, then yes, both x60 pro and me, 11- got is on main sensor and offers a very good stabilization, while recording at 1080p 30 frames per second dynamic range is better on me11. Not only that skin tone is close to reality and colors are vibrant and true to life. On the other hand, x60 pro color tone is a bit of saturated exposure, and contrast ratio is also not as good as me 11. However, if you are looking for details and textures, then VIVO x60 pro is a bit ahead.
The first thing you would notice in ultrawide photos is exposure. Suddenly, me11 exposure took a nosedive and contrast ratio is sometimes way higher than necessary. VIVO x60 pro kept the trend of slight overexposure, increased ambience and saturation and, as a result of these, along with good texture processing, shadow details are way higher and in general images are sharper and, of course, lucrative other than these white balance and skin tone in outdoor environment, under bright daylight and in indoor environment under low light changes randomly even if details and textures are better on x60 pro under bright daylight. It's not that good under low light, and actually it jumps back and forth, sometimes me, 11 and sometimes x60 pro managed to process more details. I always think about one issue why all these brands uses smaller sensor to grab more in ultrawide.
It requires grabbing more info and process more textures, but all these brands offers mid-range small sensors for ultra-wide shots. What do you think about this? Yeah? Nothing has changed in selfie portrait, all the trends and attributes of rear camera setup is here. Unfortunately, none of these two smartphones managed to reproduce true-to-life color tone, while Xiaomi mi 11 actually did fairly better with skin tone. FIFO x60 pro tried to make things beautiful, eye-catching, both effect and edge. Detection is not that different and both performed.
Well, I would say: VIVO x60 pro did a bit better and looks like flagship time for selfie photos, and I'm not going to describe these selfie photos because there is an international smartphone giveaway going on for subscribers of this channel. I will choose someone based on a valid and descriptive comment. Why don't you try to differentiate between these selfie pictures and make a comment? These videos are recorded at 4k 30 frames per second, both Xiaomi mi 11 and Vito. X60 pro started to perform differently. Yes, many Xiaomi smartphones uses different rec codec to render 4k videos, and that makes a huge difference, also VIVO x60 pro totally overexposed, and none has managed to grab enough details and processed textures that we expect on a 4k video.
Okay. What do you think? Which one is your winner, VIVO x60 pro or me11? Please don't forget to make a comment, and if you have liked this video, then please don't forget to click on the like button and share this video on your Facebook. Twitter also don't forget to subscribe to this channel. You.
Source : Han's Tech Talk