He was sup guys so in this video I'll be comparing the Galaxy watch, 46 millimeters, with the bar check, tip 2. So first, I'm doing a boot up, speed, test. I know we don't restart our smartwatches each day, but this will give us an idea about any slight performance improvement, so booting them up. At the same time. Here we go and for your information both of the smartwatches are having same amount of RAM, same processor and also same internal storage, which is 4 gigabytes. So we will see if the new watch active is able to make any difference or not so for some reason.
The galaxy watches the video here and the watching T 2 comes at second place. Ok guys, so I have divided this test into 3 different categories. First, one will be the build quality. Second, one will be the software features and daily user experience. And finally, the third one will be the price, along with my personal opinion, so talking about the build quality both of the smartwatches have great build quality watch, as we do has two options: stainless steel and aluminum, whereas the Galaxy watch only comes in aluminum, protective 2 is much lighter, and also it has a minimal design.
So it can be surprised easily, but the Galaxy watch has a rugged design, and also it is much heavier with the stock physical bezel. It kind of protects the underlying glass display. If you prefer a minimal light bit watch then just go for the watch active 2 and if you like, have to your wrist, along with the rugged design, just go with a Galaxy watch overall I'll give it a draw in terms of design and build quality to both of the smartwatches. One major difference that I have noticed between the two smartwatches is present in the display. Not only we have this a digital touch bezel, but also we have a very high signal resolution on the wall, ejected 2, which is about 364 pixels per inch as compared to the Galaxy watch.
? 78 everything, including the watch pieces on the wall, check tip two will look super crisp and clean, so in terms of display quality. Positive two is the winner here. Moving on to the second category, which is software features and overall usability, both of the smartwatches are extremely similar. So software is same on both of the smartwatches same UI is same interface. Watch acted to have new sensors an ECG monitor, but for now it is disabled, and we will have to wait for next year to get it by a software update.
Overall, the workout detection and hurt rate monitoring is very similar and both of the smartwatches, so as of now until ECG is enabled it is drawn for both of the smartwatches talking about usability, how we can forget the battery life and coming on to the major critical point, which is the battery life. Galaxy watch, has a joint 470 million pair battery, so it easily provides four to five days of battery life with a OD mode. Op and Washington ? has only 340 million pairs of battery and that lasts for about two days with every mode off. So if you prefer a longer battery life, just took over the galaxy watch and winner here in terms of battery life, is the galaxy watch now I'll move to my final point, which is a price watch at t2, is available for about two hundred and ninety-nine dollars, whereas the galaxy watch is available on eBay and Amazon for around about two hundred dollars so guys. Now it's up to you that which Smartwatch you want, depending upon your personal preference and my final verdict, or you can say decision- would be that if you're already having a galaxy wash then no need to upgrade and if you're planning to buy a Smartwatch in the future, then The Watcher you to it's a press, smart part that you can buy for Android and guys.
That was pretty much it for this video I'll see you in the next one. Until then bye bye, you.
Source : TechnoProz