Samsung Galaxy S20 camera review By GSMArena Official

Hey, what's up guys will here for GSM, marina and our galaxy has 20 review we covered in depth pretty much all you need to know about the phone, except for the cameras on paper. They are a bit of a downgrade compared to the s20 ultras. So in this video we'll do a detailed analysis and see if the regular s20 can hold its own. Let's get started, unlike the other s20 models. The regular s20 has just three cameras on the back: there's a 12 megapixel main camp, a 12 megapixel ultra-wide and a 64 megapixel telephoto camera. The only difference from the s 20 plus is a lack of a depth sensor.

So our findings here will pretty much apply to the plus as well, except for portraits. Of course, the setup is very different from the ultras for one you don't get the huge, no nacelle sensor in the main camera, so you miss out on the dramatic natural bouquet, but even so, shots from the yes twenties main cam are excellent. With low noise, great resolve, detail, wide dynamic range and mature processing. Actually, despite their differences, the output from the s20 Main cam is pretty hard to tell apart from the ultras. This is even true at nighttime where the s20 still holds its own.

There's plenty of detail. Well controlled noise and wide dynamic range light sources are rarely blown out. Despite the ultras larger sensor, we would say that the s20 can give you the same level of quality in low light and night mode makes things look even nicer by brightening the shadows and evening out the exposure. These do take longer, though, anywhere from 3 to 15 seconds, and the phone may automatically decide to skip this processing if it isn't dark enough at 4 zoom, the s20 doesn't have a periscope telephoto, since the focal length is almost the same as the main camps there's actually no optical zoom at all. It achieves 3x lossless zoom by cropping from the large 64 megapixel sensor.

The interesting thing about this sensor is that it doesn't use Samsung's, tetra-cell technology which combines 4 pixels into one. Instead, it uses a regular bear, color filter array, so you can make use of the sensors full resolution. Zoom shots during the day. Look decent, but nothing too. Special quality here is actually a bit better than last year's model, though you can zoom in up to 30x, but anything beyond 4x starts to drop in quality a lot at night.

Zoom shots are just okay. The quality is quite similar to what you get out of the note 10. There is night mode available to brighten things up, but there is some visible noise compared to what you can take with the s20 ultra. The s20 zoom in low-light looks noisy and messy. When neat feature is the ability to shoot natively with the 64 megapixel camera.

These shots come out with more detail than those from the main cap. They are a little noisier, though, and dynamic range is a bit more narrow at night. This setting isn't as good due to the lack of dual pixel autofocus. If the shot comes out in focus, though it looks decent, you don't have night mode here, yes, twenties ultra-wide camera is the same as what you get on the other s.20 models in daylight, colors or punchy and dynamic range is decent, but there's a little more noise than we'd like at night, though, we were impressed by what we could get out of this camera. Just like we were with the s20 ultra.

It really sets the bar for ultra-wide low-light performance. There is a night mode available here, and it gives you better sharpness and more saturated colors, while brightening up the exposure. Let's move on to the galaxy s, 20s portraits these come out looking good with a nice subject, separation, but there are mistakes from time to time, perhaps because it lacks a dedicated depth sensor. The S one is selfie: cam is 10 megapixels compared to the 40 megapixel unit on the s20 ultra and quality wise is great, colors are vibrant and dynamic range is quite impressive. The camera has autofocused too, which is great to have.

You can record selfie videos in 4k resolution and these look good with nice, colors and decent stabilization. Let's have a look at the video quality from the rear cameras, starting with the main one.4K footage looks really nice as expected with a wide dynamic range. You can choose zoomed 4k video from the 64 megapixel camera, and it's all done through cropping. The results are pretty good at the lower zoom levels. There's no option to record with this camera without the zoom, however, and here's a look at 4k video from the ultra wide-angle camera, just a note that you can't record 60fps video from either this or the 64 mega pixel km8 K video is a major new feature for Samsung's phones and on the s20 is actually taken with a 64 megapixel camera.

It has more fine detail than 4k video. However, it's hard to appreciate that unless you play it back on an equally high-res monitor at night, the s20 produces impressive results as far as video goes, it's not quite at the level of the ultra, but it's way ahead of last year's no 10. While stabilization is available in all video capture modes, super steady, video recording can only be taken in 1080p. This is extra smooth and, unlike the s20 ultra, can use either the main or the ultra-wide cam and finally, there's a cool feature on Samsung's new phones code single, take for a few seconds. It captures photos and short clips from all the phone's rear cameras simultaneously to better preserve an interesting moment.

So there you have it guys. Overall, the s20 s. Cameras are nothing to sneeze at, even though you might call this the budget-friendly s20 model in almost all of our comparisons. The compact, as 20, can hold its own against him more expensive as 20 ultra. It only really falls short a bit with the zoom, and it lacks natural bouquet and close-ups from the main camp.

Otherwise, the s20 delivers a stellar camera experience. Thanks for watching, stay safe and see you on the next one.

Source : GSMArena Official