Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Oneplus Nord N200 5G (2021 review and comparison) By itsMaxDigital

What's up guys in this video, comparing the Samsung Galaxy a525g with the OnePlus word and 205g. These are two impressive phones for the price and, if you like videos comparing the newest smartphones, lower and mid-range flagships, I compare all of them and the specs, if you can, if you like those type of videos, consider subscribing to my channel and for more videos, stay tuned. But let's get into this video between the 852 and the n200. So both of these phones compare very similarly. They both have 5g and they both come under 500. Both, but the a525g could also be found for around two hundred dollars in prepaid market, while the n200 could be found for free and an unlocked price at 240 dollars.

So both of these can be found for under 500 unlocked, but could definitely be found for a better price. If you look on prepaid, so the a52 measures in at 6.3 inches tall, 3 inches wide 0.3 inches thick. The n200, similar 6.4 inches tall 3 inches wide 0.3 inches thick. They weigh exactly the same voltage.6.67 ounces, which is pretty light, build quality, also same story, glass, front plastic back on both of these. These aren't made out of glass or steel or aluminum like some flagships or iPhones are, but for the price, that's okay, one difference is the a52 has ip67 dust and water resistance, while the n200 does not have that, and one is for 500 bucks unlocked the other one is 240 unlocked both of these phones have the same size display both are at 6.5 inches around 83 to 84 screen to body ratio. You have a super AMOLED 120 hertz display on the a52 versus the um LCD and 90 hertz display on the n200.

So both of these have a nice high, refresh rate, and they're, both pretty impressive 120 hertz for the 500 device, 90 hertz for the 240 dollar device. But when it comes to the resolution they are very, very close. They're, both 1080p displays full HD and the PPI is 407 on the a52 406 PPI on the n200, so they have similar displays very similar, but one is almost double the price of the other. As for software um, you have android 11 with Samsung one UI on top on the a52, you have android 11 with oxygen, OS, 11 and then 200 on top. The main differences between This is your choice of the skin.

You know if you like Samsung features, and you know like to change a lot of things um then the Samsung experience is for you and the a52. But if you like a clean, close to stack version of android, then roll with the n205g me personally, I like to have a clean stock, fluid version of android, although you know Samsung, does offer a nice skin. That's you know it's the same. Software found on more expensive galaxy devices about both of these versions of android and skins will be able to download and use all your everyday apps with no problem. You won't see any real difference in app compatibility when it comes to the chipset.

The a52 has a snapdragon 750 g, which is a mid-range while the n200 has a snapdragon 485 g processor, which is a lower end processor. Both of these again will not be flagship level, um, speed and performance, but you'll be happily surprised, um running your apps and doing every day every day-to-day activities um. One also thing I wanted to mention is that the uh that Samsung is pushing several years of updates on its um on its newer phones, but the n200 will only get one major update to android 12 and that's about it. As for the internal storage, the a52 has starting off at 128 gigs, while the n200 is 64 gigs, but both use a micros card slot. As for ram, the a52 starts off at 6 gigs of ram and 204 gigs of ram.

Both of these amounts of ram are good. Four gigs are uh more than enough for most people, but six gigs of ram uh will is a welcome addition. It's its more than four gigs um. If you use a lot of apps- and I was just getting the six gig model, but I don't anticipate a lot of people maxing out the ram on these devices. Now for the cameras, the a52 has a quad camera setup, 64, megapixel mains, 12, megapixel, ultrawide, 5, megapixel macro 5, megapixel depth, the n200 13 megapixel main shooter 2 megapixel macro 2, megapixel depth.

You can shoot 4k on the 852 1080p and the n200, so the overall better camera is going to be Samsung um, even in low light. This camera will perform pretty good while the n200 will be average at best, but it really shines. If you have enough lighting, because at low light it will not be good for selfie. The a52 has a 32 megapixel shooter, while the n200 is at 16. Megapixels a52 is at 4k and 200 1080p.

Selfie cameras are going to be okay, but the Samsung will give you better results both come with stereo speakers and both come with a headphone jack, a welcome addition on mid-range to lower end phones. As for Bluetooth and connectivity, you got Bluetooth 5.0 on a52 5.1 on the m200, but both of these will happily connect to your wireless devices such as smart bands, smartwatches, wireless headphones and speakers. For example, the a52 comes with NFC, depending on your market or region, while the n200 does in fact have it as well, and both have the USB type-c port for charging moving on to security and unlocking um big difference here, the a52 has an under the display fingerprint reader, while the n200 has a side mounted fingerprint reader. An in-display fingerprint reader usually signifies a mid-range to flagship level features. So that's probably why the price is a little higher on the a52, but there's nothing wrong with the side fingerprint reader on the n200.

As for battery both of these have great battery, but the a52 only has 4 500 Williams, which is okay, it'll last you maybe one a full day and a little into the next, but the 5 000 William battery on the n200 is the clear winner. Here will get you one two three days of use, probably and that's just because of the lower end processor, and it's just a big battery in general, the a52 has 25 fast charging, which gives you 50 charge in 30 minutes, and the n200 also has fast charging, but at 18 watts. So what are my thoughts and opinions after comparing both of the specs on these devices? Well, the Samsung Galaxy a525g is going to be a very, very nice phone, but it comes at double. The price of the m200 has a better camera. It has more internal storage um it.

It's just a has a very, very nice screen and if you are really into the uh refresher, it has 120 hertz refresh rate. The software is good if you like Samsung um, but if you like, a more if you're more on a budget, and you like you still like a nice refresh rate, you like a big battery and a clean version of android and the OnePlus Nordic 2005g is not a bad choice either. If I had to pick between these, the better overall device is the a5200g, but the better value device is the n205g by a long shot. Um tell me guys, which one do you? Would you rather have the a52 or the n200, and why uh? You could send me a comment down below, or you could uh slide into my dms on Instagram or Twitter and um. You know if you please consider subscribing if you like, to see phones being compared in specs.

I can. I compare on the reg every day, lower end mid-range and flagships. Thanks for watching guys I'll see you in the next one.

Source : itsMaxDigital