Huawei P40 Pro vs Mate 30 Pro - CAMERA COMPARISON By Shaan Haider

What's up guys this is Sean Heather and in this video we are going to do quick camera comparison of what will be for the Pro and the mid 30 Pro smartphones. So we will have a look on few images captured on both of these smartphones side by side to decide which device is better when it comes to camera performance. All of these images they are capped using the exact same setting. Obviously, p40 Pro has a bit better when it comes to software park and also the hardware is the different in both of these smartphones. But let's have a look on few made samples and let's see how much difference we are going to get in the real life scenarios. On the left hand, side there will be an image captured on, but will be 40 Pro and on the right hand, side you will find images captured on metal Pro.

So, let's start it in terms of detailing and quality both before the pro and met. The pro are pretty much similar. The only difference is that in auto mode, the dynamic range is better on p40 Pro, but the color saturation and the color reproduction is better on May 30 bro, for example. In this image we have to do pro capture the real color of the body of network that in here the first four images captured here are on the auto mode and, as you can see, that the performance of v40 Pro is better when it comes too low light imaging, especially if we have look on the sky, you can see it's more brightener compared to where Terra Pro. Now these pictures are captured on the night mode and once again you can see that performance of be photo Pro.

Are they better compared to metric roll for macro sharks? The performance is pretty much same of both of these smartphones, but, as you can see once again made three Pro. A refrigeration is a bit more, and sometimes it's very ? more, and it looks unrealistic in the HDR mode. Once again, performance of p40 Pro is a bit better compared to make 30 pro, as the dynamic range is better on before the pro, and it is also capturing more detail in the wide-angle mode. The frame capture is same for both people to blow and mentor a pro, but in terms of dynamic range and details capture. Once again, as you can see, the performance of p40 probe is a bit better compared to a 30 Pro and like most of the time here as well.

The color saturation is too high on meth 30 Pro for different camera in the auto mode. The skin tone is better and more realistic on May 30 Pro, but somehow, even without the beautification, it's a smooth name, the skin and once again the color saturation is a bit more compared to P 40 Pro, while in the auto mode before the pro is capturing more detail. The color reproduction of the surrounding is more natural, but the skin tone is not fully correct in the portrait mode, 50 both effect and the purification the overall performance of P photo Pro seems a bit better compared to Ma?tre d' bro. The both effect on P 40 Pro is sometimes way too high compared to method pro. But once again, it is our personal preference how much book effect and depth of field you like in your portrait shots.

Also, the p40 pro front-facing camera has a wider frame compared to metal bro. He had to zoom in on all image samples of P 40 Pro to make them appear equal in size. Now talking about the low-light imaging for different facing camera, the performance is pretty much same before the pro seems still actually better in terms of detailing, especially if you have a look on my hair, DJ, etc. And if you have a look on the area around the nose on the mid 30 per sample, you can see once again, even though the portrait mode is off, the beautification is of it is still beautifying the image and smoothing my skin texture. P40 Pro does not come with the HDR mode for the front-facing camera, unlike teammate 30 Pro, but it seems the auto HDR option is by default available on p40 pro camera, and the performance is even better compared to mid 30 pro.

As you can see here when it comes to assuming capability before the probe, there's a clear winner here as ex capturing more detail, a dynamic range is better, and the color reproduction is both natural and accurate compared to web 30 Pro. So it seems overall, the camera performance of p40 Pro is better compared to make to the pro. But what's your opinion about it? Which device, you think is better when it comes to camera performance before the pro or the master d pro feel free to share your feedback and opinion in the comment section below and if you enjoyed watching this video, give it a thumbs up share it with your friends subscribe. The channel do not forget to press the bell like and to get the notification or switch your uploads and see you guys next time in, video have a nice day.

Source : Shaan Haider