Camera crashed on me! Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Pixel 4 XL Camera Comparison By Daniel Sin

Today we're going to get rid of Samsung Galaxy S 20 versus the pics of 4x L. They both have the telephoto lens, so I'm curious to see how they both stack up, but the pixel does not have the ultra wide-angle lens, which is really popular, and a lot of people do like. So this is a quick low light test of the front-facing camera and the lighting is pretty usual from the city, there are lights from the streetlamps and buildings. So, let's move on to detection starting off with portrait mode they're, both kind of different I was elated. A pixel is easier to use because you just point shoot, and it does all the work right after the way sampling does it. You have to move around until the screen says ready, but in this case so far my experience.

It's really quick, but in some Samsung pictures you'll see it doesn't register which I found out while I'm editing, because on your screen, when I press the shutter button, it was ready all right. So here's the difference that I've noticed on each one on a pixel the background blur is much blurrier. It's creamier and denser also the background is more compressed, so the picture looks like it's actually from a DSLR camera on a Samsung I would say it has best of both worlds. You could use the white camera to capture a lot of more things in your picture, and also you can zoom in to get a more compressed background. But if you really want that true portrait picture, then the pixel just gives off that vibe right from the start for the front-facing camera I.

Think the clear winner for me is the Samsung just because I do like the colors more and my skin tone looks more fleshed out and pushing mode to pixels more zoomed in so if you want to take something in your hands to show off your drink or whatever, you would have to do a bit more reaching out, but it's not too uncomfortable. The white lines on a Samsung is really useful, especially if you're in tighter spaces. Okay, so I just hit record on both the phone. Just me: it's like the third or fifth time that happened is today so uh yeah, that's going to be issued, so the three chemical persons I've done so far. It happened to me twice.

The first time was when I versed it with the iPhone 11 I did restart it after, and it worked fine. But if this keep happening all the time, then this is gonna, be a big problem. Alright, so moving on it's you the everyday scenario. The Samsung s20 is gonna, be the winner here, because it does have the ultra wide-angle lens, and they can zoom all the way up to 30x. But I think the 30x is more useful for seeing things so far than trying to get a good picture on a pixel of the magazine can go up.

Is an X and I think that's still a good amount of zoom range for the everyday life and, to my surprise, it's still pretty sharp on 8x on the pixel, and sometimes I think it even looks better than the Samsung S 20. It just amazes me how well the software side of things can do so good on the pixel and if the pics will ever get an ultra wide-angle lens I think it's going to be a wrap for HDR and having the better control of the highlights and not over exposing too much. The pixel still has it down and if you're more knowledgeable about pictures, the pixel does give you dual exposure modes. So that gives you the option of having better control of exposing your picture or just adjust it. The way how you like it? Yes, the Samsung does have an exposure bar, but that brings down both the shadows and the highlights.

At the same time, I do favor the colors on a Samsung, much more just because as I'm shooting during golden hour, I do get a nice warm look to it. So it seems like the white balance on a pixel is more stripped. That may be a good thing when you're indoors and having that ugly, tungsten light on your subject, but when you're outdoors, especially during Golden Hour- and you want that nice golden look, the pixel just takes it all. The way for the like the white balance is also strong. Here.

It depends on how you, like your pictures. Realistically, the colors on your Samsung is still more vibrant, and it's a bit closer to the eyes. If you're more serious about photography, you would probably set your white balance to cancel out that ugly, tungsten look. So at this point it's really personal preference and surprisingly, at maximum on a pixel, it's still pretty sharp. The only downsides I can see is that on a pixel if the dark are really noisy, whereas on the Samsung it's clean, if you look up in the sky, you can see a lot more noise on a pixel than the Samsung, so I would highly suggest trying to get closer to your subject or get rid of all the darker spots.

Now, moving on into night mode are really dark situations. The Samsung doesn't perform as fast as I press the shutter button I could feel a bit of that lag, and it is buffer a bit when you switch to night mode. You have to wait like a quick second for it to be ready and I. Don't know if this is a glitch or not, but sometimes on a Samsung I can see 28 seconds. Maybe it thinks it's on a tripod, but it does take a little more just to go back into the four to ten seconds own and yes, it did happen to me.

I did have to hold it for 28 seconds. Maybe I just hit it at that time when it thinks I'm on a tripod on a pixel I do like how it knows that it's too dark- and you just suggest you to go to night side which you can tap, and it brings you right to that mode now for colors is a bit more washed out on a pixel, whereas on a Samsung you can still see a bit more of that saturation. Now, moving on to video to pixel can shoot up to 4k regular 4k, whereas on the Samsung it has a lot more modes than that for stabilization. I would give it to the pixel just because each hard step I take it smooths that out, whereas on a Samsung you can see the tiny microchips and for color accuracy is much more closely to that I on a pixel as well on a Samsung. The colors are really vibrant.

This guy really slick Lee is not that blue and it kind of makes the floor blue as well, and since both of these cameras do have two telephoto lenses I decided to compare them. Clearly, the pixel is the winner, and this is a quick comparison with the ultra wide-angle lens, which I do prefer and do like on phones. It's really helpful when you're in tight spaces- and you can capture everything. Samsung can shoot in 4k 60, but the stabilization isn't as good for some reason. It just kind works and your only option to record is with the main camera lens.

So you can't really use the other lenses, provided that 20 also has a Que mode which zooms in a lot which matches closely to the focal length of the pixel for the AKS stabilized, is not the best and when I'm pinning quickly, I can see a lot more jitters and stuttering, and I'm moving on to low-light situations for stabilization. They seem really similar and for my grenadiers they also are identical as well as I'm walking to this path. I notice, the white balance on a pixel is really aggressive, so we can see a change from tungsten to regular daylight now, assuming an internet telephoto lenses naturally is 3x on the Samsung and 2x on the pixel and seeing these side by side, the pixel is cleaner and more stable for 4k 60 on a Samsung there's a bit more marketers, but the is cleaner in terms of noise and for a Que I would HIGHLY avoid it in low-light is just too blurry and there's a lot of noise. So that's my comparison with these two phones. They both have their own strengths and weaknesses for the value I feel like the Samsung does offer a bit more for the money you're spending.

Let me know your thoughts down below I do have the links in the description. If you are interested in any of these phones, please follow me on Instagram give a like subscribe. If you want to see more as 20 content hit the bell, and thanks for watching.

Source : Daniel Sin