Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Oppo Find X3 Pro! | VERSUS By Versus

Hi welcome to the channel. My name is Sam, and we finally got our hands on the brand new Xiaomi mi 11 ultra. So today we are going to compare apple's finding 3 pro with Xiaomi's me 11 ultra. We are comparing both phones in terms of display performance, camera design and battery, so stay tuned and find out which phone is, in our opinion, the better phone. If you'd like to see more videos like this feel free to subscribe and hit the notification bell, let's start straight away with our review. Let the facts speak display the Xiaomi, me 11 ultra features a 6.81 inch, two color display with a 1440p quad HD with illusion. It uses an AMOLED screen which creates very natural colors.

The m11 ultra therefore measures 17.29 centimeter diagonally with a pixel density of 515 PPI. The display also has an adaptable, 120hz refresh rate, a peak brightness of 1700 nits and features Dolby Vision looks like very well-rounded display with impressive numbers. Let's have a look at uppers now. The Oppo finding 3 pro has a 6.7 inch display, which measures 17.02 centimeter diagonally and has a resolution of 1440p. Its AMOLED screen creates very natural colors and has a pixel density of 525 PPI.

It features a refresh rate of 120 hertz and a peak brightness of 1 300 nits. While they certainly have some similarities. The fine x3 pro has an advantage in terms of pixel density. The mi 11 ultra, on the other hand, has a bigger screen, is a lot brighter and features Dolby Vision. Besides that it also has an increased durability.

Thanks to gorilla glass, victors wireless competitor only features gorilla glass 5. All in all, the m11 ultra has an impressive screen, which should be one of the best on the market right now and therefore deserves to take home. The point camera the charming m11 auto, is equipped with a triple rear camera setup featuring a 50, megapixel wide angle, a 48 megapixel ultra-wide angle and a 48 megapixel telephoto camera its front. Camera has a resolution of 20 megapixels, the m11 ultra records, 8k videos at a maximum of 24 frames per second and, of course, features optical image. Stabilization that huge camera bump has got to be there for a reason.

Let's take a look at the way. Smaller camera system in apple's phone, the Oppo finding 3 pro has a quad rear camera system. It features a 50, megapixel wide angle, a 50 megapixel ultra-wide angle, a 13 megapixel telephoto and a 3 megapixel micro lens camera. Its front camera has a resolution of 32 megapixels, the x3 pro records 4k videos at a maximum of 60 frames per second, and, of course it has optical image. Stabilization.

Both phones have good camera systems but which one is actually the better system. Let's take it to our camera test and, let's find out which one does a better job. Our camera comparison starts always with the pictures taken in daylight conditions at first sight, there's no big difference, except that the planned and upwards picture looks a bit sharper. Overall, they look pretty similar but zoomed in there's. Definitely a difference.

Xiaomi looks way sharper, whereas you'll notice, grain and image compressions on opposite, but let's take a look at the plant again yep. The plant looks sharp in opp's picture, but we don't see it as a negative point for charm, since that has something to do with the focal length the plant is just closer and the focus was set on the chart in nighttime conditions. The Milan also appears a bit brighter, but at first sight, similar sharp. So, let's crop in to see how that looks like well Albert's image is a total pixel battleground the Xiaomi, on the other hand, still appears relatively sharp, but loses a lot of contrast. Still, it looks better and even though the plant isn't sharp, it looks definitely more natural on Xiaomi side as the total compression feel and opposite image in terms of the selfie camera.

We'd say they look pretty similar, except that apple might be a tiny bit sharper and Charles is better saturated. The fine x3 pro has a 5 volt, hybrid optical zoom, and a 24 digital zoom. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Milan ultra has a 5 volt optical, a 10 volt hybrid and an incredible high 120 volt digital zoom. The usefulness is still questionable. Ok, so thoughts are good.

Now, let's switch from photo feature to the video feature to find out which of these two phones takes better videos. What you can see- and here is the quality of the Xiaomi mi 11 ultra video recording. We set it to the highest possible quality. Let's see what the competitor sounds and looks like what you can see, and here is the quality of apple, finding 3 pros video recording. We set it to the highest possible quality.

Let's see what the competitor sounds and looks like. Ok, the sound quality is ok with both, but the Oppo has less background noise and therefore comes across a little clearer in terms of video quality. Xiaomi has better color, rendering its saturation looks better compared to the less saturated image of the upper. We couldn't spot a significant difference in terms of sharpness, so let's crop in a bit in post to see if the AK on the m11 ultra compared to the 4k on the fighting.3 pro can change that 2 times. Zoomed in the AK definitely makes a difference.

The mi 11 ultra comes in sharper than its competitor at 10 times from then the Xiaomi doesn't look good, but still better than upper. When it comes to slow motion videos, the elbow falls behind Xiaomi. It is able to shoot 240 frames per second in 1080p and 480 frames per second in 720p, but the Milan also throws a knockout punch at the upper with its 1920 frames per second and 1080p well opposed. Finding 3 pro has a great camera system. It performed pretty well in this comparison, but Xiaomi's huge camera bomb has definitely got a reason.

It outperformed the financial pro in terms of daylight when taking a closer look and definitely in terms of nighttime pictures, the high resolution and better color rendering and the video feature was also a plus for the me11 ultra- that all got crowned by the incredible slow motion feature. I left out the extremely high zoom because I still don't see the need for it. It's also better. Here. Point therefore goes clearly to the Xiaomi mi 11 ultra performance, the x3 pro is equipped with Qualcomm's latest ship, the snapdragon 888, the phone has 12 gigabyte ram and a storage capacity of 256 gigabytes.

The storage capacity, unfortunately cannot be expanded. The new snapdragon 888 on its own is almost a guarantee for good performance. Let's have a look at what the m11 ultra has got to offer. The mailed alter uses the Qualcomm snapdragon 8008 chips with the power efficient, 5 nanometer process technology. It offers 12 gigabyte ram and has a storage capacity of 256 gigabytes.

The storage capacity, unfortunately cannot be expanded, since almost every flagship phone in 2021 features the latest snapdragon 888. This is again a batter between siblings. Both also have the same raw power is the upper going to Standish hands, let's bring them into the an tutu benchmark. The geek bench 5 test and the 3d mark test and find out the an tutu benchmark is benchmarking the performance of both phones. The tests are divided in three phases: a performance test of the ram it tests, how the device is handling, two-dimensional, graphics and an endurance test of how the device is handling, 3d, graphics, the winner and the first test is the me11 ultra next up the geek bench 5 test.

The second test is from geek bench. This app will measure the performance of our smartphones in terms of CPU and GPU wow, okay in single and multi-core. The apple came in stronger than Xiaomi now the last test, and the third test is the 3dmark wildlife, which is a cross-platform benchmark for comparing the graphics performance of the devices well. Well. The third test was also decided in favor of apple, which makes the Oppo finding 3 pro the more powerful phones in this comparison, as it also won the geek bench 5 test.

The finding 3 pro therefore takes home the point design, the Xiaomi mi 11 alters is not just a name. It's a model. The phone has gorilla glass victors in the front, a ceramic backside and everything is framed by aluminum. The camera bump is situated at the top of the backside, and it is eye-catchingly huge. The reason for this are the three pretty big camera lenses and a 1.1-inch secondary screen. Its main purpose is to function as a notification display to show time and battery status.

Even when the phone is upside down. It also works as a screen for taking better selfies and music controller. The smartphone weighs 234 gram. It has an USB-C connector at the bottom and if you're an acoustic junkie, Charmin's got you covered on another end, though its dual speakers are manufactured by the experts of Harman Kardon. The phone also uses an end screen fingerprint sensor and AI face recognition, technology to unlock the phone and, unlike the base version, the mi 11 alters, is also ip68 water and dust resistant.

Well, it's different, but let's take a look at how different the mi, 11 ultra looks compared to the usual smartphone designs, the apple phone x3 pro has an aluminum frame and a glass finish on the back. This version has a shiny metallic finish, but there's also a matte blue one available. It features a very futuristic design with a triangular lens camera bump and the upper left corner on the back of the phone. The smartphone weighs 193 gram. It features a new PC connector and is ip68 rated.

That means that it is water and dust resistant. The phone also uses face recognition technology and a fingerprint sensor to unlock the phone. Both technologies work great as a special feature for sound enthusiasts. The x3, pro's, alarms and ringtones are custom designed by famous producer, Hans Zimmer. Well yup.

We got two different phone designs: a futuristic spacey but clean design on the Oppo and well, a totally different camera bump design on the Xiaomi. The middle of an ultra stump is freaking huge, but it contains something that no other smartphone at the moment has, and that is the little back display and because it fills out the upper part of the back and not only your corner, it doesn't wobble when laying on a flat surface. Overall, both phones feel pretty valuable, despite the fact that Oppo has gorilla glass on the front and the back and show me only on the front, but it has a ceramic back, which is also not bad. At the end, we have two different kinds of phones for different kinds of needs. I would say, if you ask us, we tend to go more for the slimmer body, so we give this point to the Oppo finding three power battery the opp.

Finding three pro has 4 500 William hours. On the other hand, the Xiaomi mi 11 ultra, has 5 000 million powers. Both phones feature incredible fast charging capabilities of 67 watt on Chevy side and 65 watt on upper side in terms of wireless charging, the finance 3 pro offers 30 watt, while the 11 ultra again features 67 watt. Both devices offer reverse wireless charging. The mi 11 alter the bigger battery and should therefore have the upper hand.

So this was a really close one, even though the mi 11 alters has a way bigger battery. It does not seem to be enough to satisfy its energy hungry hardware. On the other hand, in terms of charging capabilities, it is the Xiaomi that has some better arguments, especially concerning wireless charging, where it is twice as fast as the finite 3 pro overall. This seems more like a draw to us, so both get a point conclusion that was again a back and forth. Let us find out now which device got more points in this comparison.

As usual, we do that by going through all the categories, one more time we started off with the Xiaomi m11 altar, winning the first point for its oval better display. Then we put the device through three different benchmark tests. Two of them won the Oppo finding three pro, which means it got the point in the performance category, the huge camera bump on Chennai's phone came in with better result in the camera system. Comparison, the still decent upper had to hand over the point to the mi 11 ultra. The design category was once again a tricky one.

In the end, we decided to let the finding 3 pro get the point, since we prefer the slimmer body by the way. Let us know in the comments below which one you like more in terms of design. That brings us to the deciding point which phone is lasting longer. Well, the Oppo did last roughly 30 minutes longer, but Charles incredible charging capability led to a draw in this category. So yep.

We have three points on each side. That means we have also an oval draw in this video comparison. Naturally, we review more than these five categories covered here. If you want to see the full comparison, follow the link to our website, you can compare up to seven different smartphones at versus. com, but before you do that, please post your comments and let us know which phone you think ranks first, if you liked our video, give it a thumbs up and subscribe to our channel till then take care and see you soon.

You.

Source : Versus