Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite (6GB) vs Vivo V20 (8GB) - Speed Test & Comparison! (Snapdragon 732G vs 720G)! By TechReason

By TechReason
Aug 14, 2021
0 Comments
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite (6GB) vs Vivo V20 (8GB) - Speed Test & Comparison! (Snapdragon 732G vs 720G)!

Hey guys, what's up, I am back with the brand-new video, and so I'm to do a SP test comparison between the Xiaomi mi, 11, lite versus the VIVO v20 and cast, and the VIVO v20 has a Qualcomm snapdragon 720 g6 set with 8 GB of ram, while the Xiaomi mi 11 lite has a Qualcomm snapdragon 732g chipset, with the 8gb of ram on the back. We have a triple camera on both these two devices, so I am very, very excited to see that how HDMI level light is stacked up against the VIVO v20, so without any wasting time, let's get right into it, and both phones is completely off. So now, let's start off with the boot up test between these two devices. Here we go, and the location is here: move faster on the VIVO v20 as compared to dummy 11 light and the m11 light is running on android 11, with mini version 12, while the VIVO v20. It is also running on android 11, with the front touch OS version 11. We have this mini logo versus VIVO logo and, and you can see at the VIVO v20, it is a little faster when it comes to putting up as compared to the mid level light, and you can see about one-second difference between these two devices and, as you can see that- and both phones has a very different display.

We have full HD AMOLED display with 90 hertz differentiate, display only level light, while on the VIVO v20, we have a full HD super AMOLED display with a 60hz first redisplay, and also we have a water top-notch on the VIVO v20. While on the mi level light we have a bunch of which looks much better as compared to the VIVO v20 water top-notch. Everything is closed up in the background. No app is running in the background, and also we have same Wi-Fi network on both phones, so the first application we have is the phone dialer and that is faster on the VIVO v20, just a tiny bit faster there. Next on the list is the settings, and that is a little faster on the mi 11 light as compared to the VIVO v20.

Again, you guys are the judge of the speed desk. So now, let's see Amazon shopping on both phones, same Wi-Fi network on both phones, and that is faster on the VIVO v20 as compared to the mi level light, and you can see so now. Let's do the scrolling and that is really, really smooth on the m11 light as compared to the VIVO v20. Again we have 90 hertz, while on the VIVO v20 we have 60 hertz. So now, let's check out some games' application.

Now, let's start off with the Candice Sega again we have a snapdragon 720 g as compared to the Qualcomm snapdragon 732 g, faster on the middle level, light as compared to the VIVO v20. Let's spin out, that is exactly the same on both phones, no difference there less is supposed to fire and faster looks like on the VIVO v20, let's see, but at the end May 11 light faster there. Well, the VIVO v20s take a lot of time, and you can see huge difference between these two devices. Last game application we have is the temper n2 and that is move faster on the VIVO v20, because we have some issue on the main level light start downloading something in the background in case VIVO v20 is faster as compared to the male 11 light in this application. Now, lets opening up the twitter faster on the VIVO v20 as compared to the mid level light, lets less Snapchat faster on the VIVO v20, less Spotify, faster on the VIVO v20 again as compared to the mi level light, and you can see- that's fascinating- result Instagram faster on the VIVO v20, such and faster on the VIVO v20 as compared to the mid-level light.

So now, let's see the scrolling, and that is smoother on the mid 11 light, because we have 90 hertz as compared to normal 60 hertz on the VIVO v20. So last time I launched in the cameras on both phones default camera app. Now, let's see that which one is going to be the fastest. One is faster on the mi level light as compared to the VIVO v20. Now, let's see the internet ball, speed, rm74, Google Chrome on both phones.

Now, let's see Wikipedia. org first website, and that is faster on the mid level light as compared to the VIVO v20. So now, let's see the scrolling, and that is smoother again on the mid level light, because we have 90 hertz refresh a display as compared to almost 60 hertz. So now, let's open this and faster on the mid level light again, so you can see that that's very interesting result so guys now, let's see ram watchman on both phones, and we have an 8 GB of ram on the VIVO v20. While on the mid level light we have 6 GB of ram.

Now, let's phone dialer, no refresh, that's the settings, no refresh Amazon shopping. Let's see can't require Sega no refresh on both phones. Let's see, pin out that's the subwoofer, let's see temper into a refresh on the mid-level light. Let's see the twitter no refresh, so Ramayana is very, very good on both phones, no difference between a 6gb of ram and 8gb of ram. Let's see, Snapchat no refresh Spotify, Instagram search last way back to the internet browser where we left, and you can see and car server.

I have to say regarding the app's opening speed is faster on the medium light as compared to the VIVO v20, which is obvious, because we have a snapdragon 732 g chipset on the v11 light, while on the VIVO v20, we have a snapdragon 720 g, which is not as fast as the snapdragon 732g. Again, not a huge difference between these two devices and also management is perfect on both phones, no difference between a 6gb of ram and 8gb of ram. So that's about it, and thanks so much for watching this speed test comparison between the Xiaomi mi level, light versus the VIVO v20. Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below subscribe to my channel for daily tech. Videos follow me on Instagram and Twitter as well, and I will catch you in my next video peace out.


Source : TechReason

Phones In This Article



Related Articles

Comments are disabled

Our Newsletter

Phasellus eleifend sapien felis, at sollicitudin arcu semper mattis. Mauris quis mi quis ipsum tristique lobortis. Nulla vitae est blandit rutrum.
Menu