Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Mi Note 10 Camera Comparison By TechTablets

Hi guys welcome to one more camera comparison. So this time around I have the Shelby Men 10 up against the mid-tier. Now they are using similar camera setups because on the rear we do have that 108 megapixel Samsung, h, MX main sensor with an EFT 1.6 aperture, but up front. We've got a 20 megapixel camera on the 10, and then we have a 32 megapixel one on the new ? Tim. So let me know in the comments which one do you think looks better here with the front-facing camera and video. Both of them are sadly lacking any form of optical image.

Stabilization sorry, electronic image stabilization. So if I run ahead or even just walking over, you can see it does rock around all over the place here. So in this video I'm going to be swapping between the audio sources, just like all my other comparisons just to see which one has the best microphones and the audio, which one is Go course be, the best 4k 30 frames per second. The 10 does support 4k 60, but it's not as steady as this, so I'm going to demonstrate just how good the electronic image stabilization here is so walking down these steps and I will actually jog a here a little ?, so you can see very, very steady on both of them, considering how much I'm moving around it's doing an excellent job, and probably one of the best I have seen in a smartphone here now when you pan, you do get some noticeable stutter coming through more on the notes, Tim, and that's probably because of the weaker chipset- that Snapdragon 730, with a weaker image signal processing unit that it has on the chipset. Well big starter right, then, if you just store, this is ultra-wide now 4k 30 frames per second I'm noticing perhaps a little more study.

Yes, when panning on the weaker chipset again here. So that's one thing to bear in mind, so we do have a difference here with the sensors and I can see different colors as well. So this is down to software, but we were up against 12 20 megapixels. With the note, 10, and then we've got 13 megapixels on the meet in here. So that's.

Why? There's a bit of a difference now that was ASEAN, I'm gonna, briskly, walk ahead is very good on both of them, even with the ultra-wide, which doesn't have any optical image stabilization. So this is 4k now I'm, looking at the iron tower here at the end of last rotors. So this is one thing that the note 10 has that the meet 10 doesn't the normal version is because the 5 times optical zoom, but the quality, as you can see, is very pixelated, and I wouldn't be shooting video with this at all. So the two times you're, seeing right now on the 10, is an excellent. It can do so.

Yes, we get a little closer, but personally I think I prefer the 2 tonnes footage here, because it just looks so grainy with the 5 times optical video. This is now with the super stabilization mode on, and you can see. We've got more of a crop for some reason on the meet in no idea. Why but both of them they are very stable. Using this much I'm going to run ahead as best I can through the rocks here, and you can see that that is just really steady, even jumping up and down through this very, very good stabilization here.

So here, I can't see a little of a difference here with a front-facing sensors, it to me looks like they could actually have a little less noise on the Minor team, which is no surprise because this, of course has a Snapdragon 730, not quite as powerful, but it's all the difference to do with software optimization and differences with the sensors as well. Of course, there too. So let me know in the comments which one you think is better both pretty bad here in these conditions, because of the lack of stabilization, it does look actually ok compared to other phones out there. It's just I really wish that Jeremy would implement electronic image. Stabilization on this front-facing cameras, like 4k 30 frames per second, both of them seem very similar, although I'm noticing more stutter when panning with the amino 10 here, because probably of that weaker tips, it that it does have is probably having a bit of an impact with that with the processing focus on both actually seems, ok doesn't tend to jump around, which can often happen in low-light.

Let us know in the comments which one you think actually looks a little better here, I think it's almost identical very, very hard to tell any difference walking here you can see we get some different little noticeable stammer coming through with the electronic image stabilization, not working quite as well in these conditions. Okay, so that is the camera comparison now you know the difference between the Men to 10 and the 10 that there are some slight differences there. So really it comes down to a couple of things. If you don't need the 19 Hertz screen, you don't need the 5g or the faster chipset. You don't game a lot.

You don't mind those slight panning stutters that come through with the Men 10, then I would get that model for very, very similar camera performance. Great video stabilization as I have shown you and what you're looking at right now it is very good effect, probably one of the best I've already said that probably 2 or 3 times in this video, but it really is good, now low-light performance very similar on both of them. Let me know in the comments which one do you think had the edge now, of course, we do have a slightly higher megapixel count. Well, it's 20 megapixels versus the 13 on the ultra-wide cameras and then the Men 10 has the 5 times optical as well there and the two times. Camera now should have the show-me me 10 Pro, hopefully next week, so there'll be more camera comparisons, so do subscribe and stay tuned for more from me.

Source : TechTablets