Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Oppo Reno 2 Camera Comparison By Daniel Sin

Today we're gonna, compare the Samsung, Galaxy has 20 versus the Alberio 2 price-wise I know it's a big difference, although it's much cheaper, but it still has a lot of cameras on the back now. I know the OPPO does tend to take a lot of natural-looking pictures, but the Samsung has died out of saturation lately, especially on the s20 series. So let's see how they stack up against each other. So this is the quick low-light test of the front-facing camera and there are some streetlights above me as well as some buildings. So as we went to the next section, so starting off with the portrait mode, its experience is pretty similar. You would have to move around until the camera recognizes what you're shooting and then defect will work.

Now it doesn't work all the time because, if you're too far or too close, it doesn't really recognize the object. So, in my experience there are times when it just took too long for me to move around, so I just give up and I just took the picture anyways on a galaxy s.20 there are options you can actually zoom in to use the telephoto lens to get a more compressed background. Look on Alberio, ? you're, only stuck with one focal length for the front-facing camera. ? s20 is really finicky when I'm wearing a mask, but when I take it off, it instantly recognizes my face. There are times when I can see the effect working, but when I hit the shutter button, the effect doesn't work when I look at the images now for the background blur I would prefer to as 20, because it's just denser, and it looks better and I- think having a telephoto lens doing portrait mode of people really makes the image looks really nice for low-light.

The front-facing camera on a Poe tends to break apart very quickly. In my skin, tones on s20 seems to be more flushed out, but over as approachable experience. Thus names like galaxy s xx does seem to recognize objects or people quicker than a blurry, no ? for everyday situations, from getting into ultra white mode up into zooming, and they're. Both really similar I would say. The biggest difference here are the colors.

The Samsung is saturated from the Apple standpoint because from the OPPO we know it's just more natural. So if you do like pictures, that's really close to the eye and opportunity to is the winner. But if you do prefer more of the saturated and more contrasting colors the pictures that are already ready to be shared online, then the s20 is going to be the easier choice for you for HDR I would refer to one on the galaxy s 20. The highlights are exposed and controlled. Well and I know the shadows are a bit dark, but I feel like because of how contrasting the pictures are on a Samsung.

It's already expected, and it's part of the look on Apple. You can see more in the shadows, which is really close to what you really see from your eyes. Now, from using the lenses, the Samsung does have the wider ultra white lines, so taking shots of buildings and landscapes does make it look more epic, but when I'm zooming in I would say it's easier on op, pie cos, 3x and 5x are perfect enough, where they would make a difference on its Samsung. You get a lot more options. You get like 2, 4, 10 20, so they're like little stepping stones.

If you want to have more controlling options, then the Samsung is the better one, but for simplicity, OPPO is the way to go. There's one thing I want to point out is that when I'm zooming in using the different lenses, the colors tend to change or change slightly, but using these two phones, they're really consistent, I know that using honor and Huawei phones. They change a lot, but I plot the consistency on these two phones for the light. The sampling pictures seems to be too dark a want, because naturally it just seems to create those contrasting pictures. A pro about that is that the blacks are really black, and it doesn't seem to look too faded, like the OPPO.

Now for the galaxy s, 20s performance in low light is really sluggish, which is something I mentioned a lot in a lot of the comparisons. So this means that taking low-light pictures on the OPPO is much smoother moving on to night mode, which they both have on a Samsung. The image is produced or much brighter now, sometimes that would make the pictures look too fake. But to be honest, if using that mode, you want to see everything the process on s xx is a bit longer. You have a countdown timer, whereas on the upper we know ?, it takes bursts of pictures and then kind of stitch them together.

It's really fast and simple, and you just have to hold it there, for maybe three or four seconds, and you're done now. Moving on to video on a main lines for K 30 think both are pretty similar in terms of stabilization I would say: the Samsung is a bit smoother. HDR is like the same reasoning. It's still more contrasting. So two blocks or the shadows are much darker.

So if you like to see everything and more of even tone, then the APA we know ? is the better choice. Next up is the colors. Obviously the Xperia Men ? is really close to the eye. The greens really look green and on a Samsung, it's really warm. It's almost to the point where the leaves look like they're, yellow.

Now, moving on to the ultra wide-angle lenses, the Samsung one is really smooth. It looks like I'm almost on a gimbals, so hands down. I'm going to pick that as the winner next big Pro is that it shoots in 4k 30 on the Apple Reno -. Once you switch to ultra-wide it just converts to 1080 30. An annoying thing is that if you go back to the main camera lens, it doesn't auto switch back to 4k 30, you would have too manually.

Do it all the time, so the Samsung can shoot 4k 60, whereas on OPPO you can't so just comparing the 60 frames per second part. It does seem like the Samsung doesn't have. Any stabilization is really jerky and shaky by switching down to 1080p 60 on both it seems like the stabilization works. Fine, so it's pretty much evened out for the color is just so the same thing. The Samsung is still pretty warm.

It's to the point where the ground it looks a bit yellow on a Samsung. You can shoot up to a K 30, which is a really cool feature, and it's pretty cropped in by a lot I. Don't think this is something a lot of people would use, but it's really nice to have just in case or is the feature that you can brag about because again shoot a K. While your friends, film, can only shoot up to 4k for a low light, both of them I'm, not really that good, but I'm surprised how well it can handle with their micro jitters throughout the tests. I would say in this condition the colors are really close to each other.

Even on a contrast, the Samsung might be a hair darker now using the ultra wide-angle lens is something that I will not recommend it during low light. But comparing it to the Samsung to me is the better one. Now for 4k, 60 versus 1080, 60 I would say, the Apple RINO does have an edge here is the hole stabilization does go out for me, but I would prefer two colors on a Samsung now for both being 1080 60. That's when I switched back to you to Samsung, because it stabilized and the colors or the contrast seems to be closer to I, because the blacks looks really faded or washed out on a PO. So overall, the biggest difference here are the colors and contrast up also has the more neutral looking colors for the Samsung is still really saturated, even though they did dye it down a bit, but that's just comparing it right.

Next to a natural. Looking camera phone, you really can't go wrong with any of these phones, for OPPO is just much easier and simple to use. Where else on the Samsung, you get a lot more options. So that is my comparison between these two phones. I hope you guys enjoyed it.

Please follow me on Instagram, give a like subscribe hit the bell, and thanks for watching.

Source : Daniel Sin