Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 - Durability, Display, Performance, Camera Comparison By Valor Reviews

The reason why the Samsung Galaxy a72 is different from the Samsung Galaxy a52 is the Samsung Galaxy. A72 has a slightly bigger display, slightly bigger battery and an 8 megapixel telephoto camera. That's it now. I just saved you the stress of watching the entire video. If you appreciate that hit the like button and subscribe, you can leave now. But if you want to know more about these, two devices stick around and let the comparison begin for the price.

The Samsung Galaxy, a52, cost 147, 600, area or 295 dollars for the six gigabyte ram, 128 gigabytes, internal storage version, while the Samsung Galaxy a72 cost 198 styles on 500, area or 397 dollars for the 8 gigabyte, ram, 128, gigabytes internal storage option, the build quality, isn't what makes the Samsung Galaxy a72 more expensive. Both smartphones have a plastic rare plastic frame, and the display of both smartphones is protected with corning gorilla, glass 5. Both can be abused and still function. These smartphones are tough, but don't just drop them on their face. Both smartphones are ip67 water and dust resistance up to 1 meters for 30 minutes and as for the weights, the Samsung Galaxy a72 is the heavier device now for the external features.

Both smartphones have a dual stereo speaker, and they sound identical. They both have a hybrid sim card tray and a memory card slot. They both have an in-display fingerprint scanner, and I found the scanner of the Samsung Galaxy a52 to be more accurate and responsive. Both smartphones have a 3.5 mm audio jack, USB type-c port and a secondary microphone at the top. So for the external features, it's basically the same.

What about the display? Well, the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with a 6.5 inch.1080P super AMOLED display, while the Samsung Galaxy a72 has a 6.7 inch.1080P super AMOLED display both displays have a 90 head refresh rate and both displays are vibrant and equally bright for the display quality. They are identical. The only difference I can see is the Samsung Galaxy. A72 is taller. It has a bigger display.

I personally prefer the display size of the Samsung Galaxy a52. It's a more compact smartphone that can use with one hand now for the processors. It's the same again. They both come with a snapdragon 720 g processor, it's an eight nanometer processor, a metering processor that offers decent gaming and multitasking capabilities. Speaking about multitasking, it's slightly better on the Samsung Galaxy a72, because it has 8 gigabytes of ram against the 6 gigabyte of ram on the Samsung Galaxy a52 for gaming.

Both smartphones come with the arena 618 GPU, and they played games at the same graphics settings pop g ran at HD, graphics and high frame rate and at 30 frames per second Call of Duty ran at very high graphics and very high frame rates. Now for gaming, I found the Samsung Galaxy a52 to be more compact, it's easier to game on this smartphone because of the size for the operating system. Both smartphones are running android 11 with one UI 3.1 and both will get monthly security update for four years or two or three android OS updates. Now, let's talk about the cameras. The front-facing camera of both smartphones come with a 32 megapixel front-facing camera, and they take identical pictures.

Samsung really do spend a lot of time, perfecting the cameras, and I'm particularly impressed with the camera of the Samsung Galaxy a52, because it isn't all that expensive and the pictures look, sharp, detailed and vibrant portrait shots, look very good on both smartphones and still, I can't see any difference. Night photos using the front-facing camera are identical as well. What's up guys so right now, I'm using the front-facing camera of both smartphones, I'm shooting in 4k 30 frames per second and what you guys think about the video quality and the audio quality coming from the Samsung Galaxy 872 and a52 shooting in 4k 30 frames per second, it does look good dynamic range is on point. What would you guys think I'm liking it? I'm really liking it now, moving to the rear camera again, they both come with a 64 megapixel main camera, a 12 megapixel, ultra-wide camera and both smartphones have a 5, megapixel micro camera. Now for the differences, the Samsung Galaxy a52 comes with a 5 megapixel depth, camera that's not available on the Samsung Galaxy a72, while the Samsung Galaxy a72 comes the 8 megapixel telephoto camera, which is missing on the Samsung Galaxy a52.

Now for the 64 megapixel main camera photos are very vibrant, and they look clean and identical again. The 12 megapixel ultra-wide camera takes very good pictures. They are colorful, and again they look identical macro shots on both smartphones are good and yeah. You guessed it. They look identical now.

What differentiates both smartphones is. The Samsung Galaxy a52 has a five megapixel dead camera and the Samsung Galaxy a72 doesn't have that camera, but for portrait shots I can't see any difference between both smartphones. Now for the telephoto camera, the Samsung Galaxy a72 can take 30x photos, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 can only take 10 x photos what's up guys now, I'm shooting in 4k 30 frames per second, and the footage looks beautiful guys. This is 4k 30 frames per second on both smartphones and let me just take a jog and see which one stabilizes the image better in 4k 30 frames per. Second, let me pick up my pace.

Um, They look identical so yeah. This is 4k 30 frames per second on both smartphones. What do you guys think about the video and audio quality coming up from both smartphones? Now, something that is interesting is you can shoot in 4k 30. Per second using the wide-angle camera and yeah? This is what it looks like shooting in 4k 30 pence per second using the wide-angle camera. Now, something to note is when you're shooting in 4k attachment first I.

Second using the wide-angle camera. There is no video stabilization in the ultra study mode, and I'm running jogging actually and, as you can see, the footage is butter, smooth yeah. So if you want steady footage, you can use this steady mode to achieve that. Is the 8 megapixel telephoto camera important to me? Well, no, I don't intend to spy on my neighbors, but if you're into that this is the phone for you now for the batteries. The Samsung Galaxy a72 has the bigger battery here.

It has a five thousand Williams battery, and it comes with a 25 watts charger, while the Samsung Galaxy a52 has a 4 500 Williams battery, and it only comes with 15 watts, fast charger. Now considering the price of the Samsung Galaxy a52, I think Samsung should have included a faster charger. I mean other smartphones at this price range are using fast chargers now for the charging time it took the Samsung Galaxy a72 one hour, 26 minutes to charge from zero to one hundred percent, while it took the Samsung Galaxy a52 one hour and 36 minutes to charge from zero to one hundred percent for the battery drain test. I calibrated the display of both smartphones and I ran an tutu benchmark score for three hours. Now, after three hours, the battery level dropped to 46 percent on the Samsung Galaxy a52, while the Samsung Galaxy a72 battery dropped to 43 percent.

I launched Gandhi impact for two hours and the battery level of the Samsung Galaxy a52 dropped to eight percent. While the Samsung Galaxy a72 dropped to 10 percent, the Samsung Galaxy a52 died. First, followed by the Samsung Galaxy a72 and under sustained load, you get almost identical battery life on both smartphones. Now, for me, the Samsung Galaxy a52 is the device I'll pick it is cheaper. The build quality is the same performance is the same.

The cameras are almost the same except the Samsung Galaxy a72 has a telephoto camera, which I don't really need, and the battery life is identical. So that's it for this comparison. Now you know the device to pick. Thank you for watching hit the like button hit the subscribe button, and I will see you guys soon. Gala signing out.

Source : Valor Reviews