LG Velvet VS LG V60 Cameras! #LGVelvet By J. Williams

Hey guys welcome back to another video of me and jay, so today we're going to look at the cameras on the v60 and the velvet v16, and I have been working on this video for a few days trying to fit it in alongside the other video videos that I'm doing, and this video is going to be pretty interesting. It's a quick video, it's um, not very long at all and um you're, going to see the quality of the footage from the velvet and the v60 in this video. So I'll. Let you look, and then I'll tell you my thoughts after the fact, because you're gonna, you're gonna, say well you're gonna, ask which one is more accurate things like that, so check out these photos, and I'm cropping some of these photos this time. So you can kind of see a closer look at them. Uh the v60 will be on the left and the bell will be on the right and so just check out these photos and also put some video samples in here too and remember.

I started working on this video a few days ago, so you know it's still the same yeah. I want you to look at the quality of the video and I want you to look at the quality of the photos, because photos is probably what's more important to a lot of people and because you post things like that on social media, so check this out, and we'll be right back. Furthermore, I did not just give like a sign-off we'll be right back all right. Here's a quick sample from the v60 for the front camera. All right here is the uh velvet front, camera quick sample all right, so here's the rear camera on the v60, just a quick uh sample, see how it looks all right.

Now. Here's the uh velvet rear camera. You can see how the quality looks quite simple, all right. So what do you think? Hashtag? The media grab your shirt, so here's what I kind of saw after I took those photos, and I put them together side by side. To answer your question.

I know someone's going to ask me which one is more accurate for photos. The velvet is more accurate, uh. The v60 for some reason blew out a lot of the photos: um not, not bad, it just wasn't as accurate as the velvet. The velvet is almost spot on with these colors, and I'm taking a picture of the same thing that I always take a picture of, so you can get some knowledge of you know hey. This is what it's supposed to look like, so the velvet, while it appears that it's punchier, that's actually the color of the stuff that I'm taking, especially the love believe those are actually the colors of those little um pictures, and so, to my surprise, I was like wow.

This is kind of strange that this, the v60 is when you get it next to the velvet, how much more uh vivid and the velvet is and more accurate. Now, as far as video uh the front camera on the v60, I think it's a lot better uh it just it does a lot better than the velvet's front camera the velvet to get a good video out of it. I need to be in perfect lighting or a perfect scenario, not just lighting. It has to be in a perfect space to where it's not blowing out the background. So much with the ISO cranking it too high making things look whiter uh, but overall, I think the v60 definitely has the better front camera now.

As far as the rear camera goes, I really like the rear camera on the velvet. I could actually use the velvet to shoot videos on the channel for the rear camera to do unboxing and things like that. Like those top-down shots or some b-roll, the available would be just fine. The v60, obviously is fantastic with the rear camera, but the velvet has the both voice. The cameras are identical in their functionality, uh they have the okay voice.

Both of them have that they have ASMR it's its it's all the same, so I'm kind of shocked at how uh close the velvet might appear to be to the v60, uh and, and that kind of caught me off guard. I was like whoa, you know this is kind of surprising that the velvet is actually standing a little of a chance against the v60, but I knew it wouldn't be a landslide. Some people thought oh, this will be a landslide it'll blow out uh the velvet. That's not the case and um the velvet does have the 48 megapixel and the v60 has the 64. I believe, so you know megapixel count is important to a lot of people, but not so much to me and everything that I do.

I want a quality photo. So, yes, I'm only shooting things around the house, but you still should be able to get some just of how good a camera is. It doesn't matter what you're taking a photo of some people say you need to go outside. You need to do this, you don't you don't have to do that you're, not always outside you're, not for the people that want to do low light shots always tell me you need to do low-light shots. I don't focus on low-light shots, because that's not what I do.

I don't take photos at night. Furthermore, I turn the light on, so you know I try to make it as bright as possible, but nonetheless, if you just wanted to look at low-light footage, neither one of the cameras are going to do that. That great to me, I think the pixel and the iPhone do better at low light uh in most situations. But overall, what do you think about the v60 versus the velvet? Do you think that the velvet got beat up on? Do you think the v60 got beat up on? Are you shocked that the velvet even stood a chance at all with the photos, because I am, I'm actually kind of surprised at how well and how? How much more accurate the velvet was when taking some photos, not all, but some uh, especially look at the blacks and the browns look at how vivid they are and punchy they might appear to be on the velvet compared to the v60. So there you have it.

What do you guys think the Sherman j camera comparison a little short camera comparison with the v60 and the velvet? I think it's a good one. I think either one you're going to be happy with that's just my thoughts on it see in the next one. Take care, strap it up.

Source : J. Williams