iPhone 11 Pro vs XS vs X SPEED Test! By EverythingApplePro E A P

Welcome back guys today, let's test out Apple's latest processor, the Apple, a 13 in this video I'd like to compare the iPhone 11 probe to the iPhone 10 s to the iPhone 10. This is three generations of mostly I'd, say the same design, just camera differences and processor differences. Let's see how far they've come in that regard now, Apple did not upgrade the RAM still at a paltry four gigabytes compared to most of the Android competitors, but the processor is the crown jewel here now, I'd like to start with the real world speed test, we're going to run through these apps consecutively, and I think it applies to most, as you probably use one or more of these applications throughout your day, just a good way to gauge the speed of a new device and on the Left being the ten slowest of the bunch. Three gigabytes of RAM on the right is 11 pro, with four gigabytes in the fastest processor. Of course, the 13 so I started with some light. Social media applications then jumped into a photo editing program with a 10k image all handled that fairly well.

Now the first large game player, unknowns battlegrounds, which is fairly heavy app and the iPhone 11 Pro breeze through its followed closely by the 10s then on to the next big game, asphalt 9. Now, throughout the course of the day, while filming this video I have several observations. I'd like to share with you, I was very shocked at how close the tennis followed, the iPhone 11 Pro they were neck-and-neck pretty much, and I suspect that this is because most of the developers have not taken advantage of extra power that Apple has given them. Yet, with the Apple, a 13 most of the optimizations would be coming from Apple's end, and I'm, not sure how far they penetrate into the apps. So maybe that's why the iPhone 10s is doing so well here at one point: it even overtook the iPhone 11 Pro.

They were just bouncing back and forth for a little while the iPhone 10 without a doubt was the slowest of the bunch. Many of the applications just hung on and took a very, very long time. You can tell that this device is finally showing its age. It is now several years old, so it only makes sense. Now the iPhone 11 Pro did overheat a lot and that's something I've noticed even with my personal one in casual use, it heats up, there's even a weird sound coming from the display at one point very strange, and I'm sure, with Iowa's 13.1, things will get a little better, but for now you can tell that the device is in pretty rough shape straight out. The door and this speed test may not be fully indicated of its capabilities, so I'll have to redo it at a later time.

So at this point we're getting fairly close to the end of round one on both the 10s and 11pro as it's compiling the 4k video, which is about a minute and 30 seconds in length, and lo and behold, it was one second behind in the iPhone 11 Pro. That blew my mind and this time around I loaded up the speed test with plenty of heavy applications which the tennis handled very well, the iPhone 11 Pro I wouldn't say: did it necessarily that much better so round? Two I noticed that on the iPhone 10s there were a few open applications in the beginning, more than on the iPhone 11 Pro further backing up my point that it's a non optimized device and things should improve in the future, I mean, theoretically, it's a stronger device as the same amount of RAM. There's no other reason why else like some applications just weren't open on round 2, and that's why the iPhone 10s got such a lead here, some apps were open, and it was able to gain an advantage on the iPhone 11 Pro. Meanwhile, the iPhone Town was left in the dust with a round one time of 4 minutes and 23 seconds, which was a bit disappointing, because I think it did better in iOS 12, not to mention. There was one issue that became very apparent and that's heat when you're running so many games.

So many big games on these iPhones I noticed that there's a defect where Apple will actually dim the display to about half or a third of its max capacity like the iPhone 10 is in right now in order to minimize the heat inside. These things cooked up so hot no kidding, like the device, would slow down from the heat and I think going forward for future iPhones Apple should definitely implement some sort of thermal management inside, like Samsung, has the cooling chambers or whatnot. It's simply not enough, as is anyways back to the test. The iPhone 10s surprisingly won round two. It has the same amount of RAM for gigabytes as the iPhone 11 Pro yeah.

It had more apps, preloaded or still loaded after round one in the background, giving it a 30-second advantage over Apple's latest iPhone 11 Pro. This to me is shocking. You'd think your new iPhone would be able to handle application management, Ram management even better than the old one, but it does still have the same amount of RAM I. Guess not many changes at just a very surprising result. If you have a 10 s, and you're thinking about upgrading to an 11 or 11 Pro, just for the performance, don't there is no difference.

I mean from what I can see at least here and from the iPhone 10 to the iPhone 11 Pro I'd say a pretty wide margin like I would upgrade there and, let's move on to the next round of speed tests before we continue want to cool these off. I do suspect. There's some sort of thermal throttling going on as the new iPhone, even in regular use, gets very hot. Now I want to continue with a start-up test. All these are off all of them.

On the latest iOS 13 firmware. Here we go in three two one they're off, so this is three generations and then the fourth we're going to see that 2020 refresh they're pretty much a carbon copy of each other. Unless you turn them over and actually look at the back side and wow, the iPhone 10 started up first, would you look at that, and second is the 10s and Wow considerably later the iPhone 11 Pro on iOS 13? That's very shocking to see and with the app switcher is cleared, I'm gonna, try and launch some apps here, one two three pretty much the same there and camera applications, so some stock ones first, and this is really hard, but one two three and yeah just about the same. There App Store here one two, three pretty close for system, apps, I'd, say fairly close here asphalt on all one two three and this one is fairly heavy on all of them fortnight. By far was the longest loading and the iPhone 11 Pro suffered heavily with that one for whatever reason- and it appears that this one is loading first yeah, so in a standalone race, it did load first with how anything else really going on.

In the background, cool and YouTube here, one two three 10s was last Spotify, one, two, three all pretty much down the line here of 10 being the last one, so in standalone, app launching I wouldn't even say, there's that much of a difference whatsoever, it's pretty much the same you're, very unlikely to notice any big difference. It's only the big apps like fortnight, where I really noticed it for us, I've done some safari testing. All the websites that I tried to show you comparison between. They all load at the exact same time, really almost no difference once you're at this level of performance in a smartphone and the browser scores are all the same. So a lot closer than you think like do not upgrade to the new iPhone just from performance alone like even the iPhone 10, is not bad.

It's well optimized with time. Apple has polished it fairly well, there was no reason to be here for performance alone. You have more than enough already now, let's jump into Geek bench and see what we can get here with an actual benchmark. This is where you usually see all the differences is only in the numbers' usability as I've shown you, the iPhone 11 Pro may even be a downgrade from the 10s at first with time, of course, the app developers, everything they'll, update, the apps it'll get better, but for now I just don't see a reason to upgrade for performance. Okay- and there are those scores- the iPhone 10 seems to suffer from this problem- a lot where, when it overheats the screen, dims some sort of throttling is going on.

Having that a lock here now, as you can see steady evolution, this is using the new Geek bench 5 pro metrics, it's a little different, but fairly in line with what you're going to see on most of these devices, both multi and single. Now in the benchmarks. Yes, it's impressive I'm not seeing this performance being reflected in the OS just yet the animations, if anything on the iPhone, 11, Pro or even buggier, especially when you're trying to move apps I noticed the stutter. Did you see that when you grabbed it system, animations are not very smooth here? It's a slow, stutter I! Don't understand why so the Polish certainly is not there yet now, while it's running the an tutu test, just want to see the hottest point on the phones, so we've got 97 degrees on the 11pro of 99 on the 10s max 101, so running a little hotter and the iPhone 10 104 degrees, definitely struggling the most here, so I think all could do better. Oh, I love and pros.

Actually at 102 1, you know, 102 is in Tudor results are much more promising on the 11 Pro, a bigger difference than I thought memory, though lacking on all of Apple dropped the ball on this one. Six gigabytes of RAM would have justified. The pro naming before in 2019. I, simply think is not enough. As this video has proven.

Last thing I wanted to do is test the Wi-Fi six capability, I do have a Wi-Fi six routers, and we'll be seeing the LTE performance, which should be about thirteen fifteen percent, better solid performance, all around. Now using my eleven pro in just the last day around my house, where usually I, have some spotty signal spots. It's been great, like Wi-Fi makes. I can tell permeates the walls better, and I'm just generally happy with the service, so one more on cellular, so I live in a dead zone with a Verizon and my tennis, you know, understandably with it's awful Intel modem got the worst speed. The iPhone 10 was faster than my love and probe, but the test would yield different results from time to time.

So I wouldn't call this anywhere near conclusive. Let's check out this multi angle, face ID, see if it's actually there wouldn't say from not one, two three it unlocks just about in the same angle as the iPhone 10s here once again from side a little. Okay, maybe a little. You know, I wouldn't say it's anything special in what angle were they talking about? Okay right there, but the tennis did it to and once again so, I'll be looking at the pro unlocked tennis from the same angle, unlocks wouldn't say: there's anything special about the angle. It's exactly the same.

For me, tennis on the left, 11 pro on the right face, ID one, two, three mm-hm, not any faster I, say that the speed improvements they were talking about just adhered to, iOS 13 as a whole, because that does improve it on all face IV devices, otherwise, between the 10s and the hello I'm, probably not seeing a difference. Let's see between the 10 one, two three make it a little faster in on the animation scale. One two three yeah one, two, three: okay, pretty close there: it's not that much faster, just a little, but then again that does add up over time to three so yeah. The animation is a little faster here on the 11pro, otherwise both are fairly good. And that concludes my speed test.

I'm shocked that the iPhone 11 Pro is not that much faster in most areas versus the 10s or even the iPhone.10 I mean surprisingly such a small amount of difference. So hope you learned a thing or two peace.

Source : EverythingApplePro E A P